Meet new scuba divers, maintain a virtual dive log, participate in our forum, share underwater photos, research dive sites and more. Members login here.

what will you do ?
SCUBASMITTY - 5/16/2010 2:12 AM
View Member Articles
Category: Other
Comments: 4

Obama Finds Legal Way Around The 2nd Amendment And Uses It.

If This Passes, There Will Be CIVILWAR
Just got this ... pass it far & wide.

On Wednesday Obama Took the First Major Step in a Plan to Ban All
Firearms in the United States
On Wednesday the Obama administration took its first major step in a
plan to ban all firearms in the United States. The Obama
administration intends to force gun control and a complete ban on
all weapons for US citizens through the signing of international
treaties with foreign nations. By signing international treaties on
gun control, the Obama administration can use the US State
Department to bypass the normal legislative process in Congress.
Once the US Government signs these international treaties, all US
citizens will be subject to those gun laws created by foreign
governments. These are laws that have been developed and promoted by
organizations such as the United Nations and individuals such as
George Soros and Michael Bloomberg. The laws are designed and
intended to lead to the complete ban and confiscation of all

The Obama administration is attempting to use tactics and methods of
gun control that will inflict major damage to our 2nd Amendment
before US citizens even understand what has happened. Obama can
appear before the public and tell them that he does not intend to
pursue any legislation (in the United States) that will lead to new
gun control laws, while cloaked in secrecy, his Secretary of State,
Hillary Clinton is committing the US to international treaties and
foreign gun control laws. Does that mean Obama is telling the truth?
What it means is that there will be no publicized gun control
debates in the media or votes in Congress. We will wake up one
morning and find that the United States has signed a treaty that
prohibits firearm and ammunition manufacturers from selling to the
public. We will wake up another morning and find that the US has
signed a treaty that prohibits any transfer of firearm ownership.
And then, we will wake up
yet another morning and find that the US has signed a treaty that
requires US citizens to deliver any firearm they own to the local
government collection and destruction center or face imprisonment.

This is not a joke nor a false warning. As sure as government health
care will be forced on us by the Obama administration through
whatever means necessary, so will gun control.

Read the Article

U..S. reverses stance on treaty to regulate arms trade

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The United States reversed policy on Wednesday
and said it would back launching talks on a treaty to regulate arms
sales as long as the talks operated by consensus, a stance critics
said gave every nation a veto.

The decision, announced in a statement released by the U.S. State
Department, overturns the position of former President George W.
Bush’s administration, which had opposed such a treaty on the
grounds that national controls were better. View The Full Article
Here 14
Nov. 2009>
Please forward this message to others who may be concerned about the
direction in which our country is headed.

Silence as well as censorship will lead us to Socialism.!!


LimestoneCowboy - 8/13/2010 8:52 PM
I can’t stand the "That can never happen here in America" mentality. I keep thinking of the frog that was boiled slowly alive in the pot of water, with the heat being turned up little by little, he never noticed the water getting hotter. I also think of how Germany and Russia had gun control laws, and when the Dictators got ELECTED they came to your house if you were registered legally, and shot on spot if you did not turn in your weapon. Never buy firearms from a store and when you buy ammo pay with cash.
I have to stop agreeing with you now cause this is a dive site lol.
SCUBASMITTY - 5/17/2010 11:09 PM
I would rather be ARMED and wrong, then DIS armed and right...

I appreciate your response and look forward to it again... THANX !
SCUBASMITTY - 5/17/2010 11:06 PM
I respect your opinion, but we both know that what the government can get away with they will do. if they are LEGALLY elected or not makes no difference,there is NO WAY that they or any other entity of the government will ever announce their plan’s to usurp the constitution.the treaty can be, under INTERNATIONAL LAW can be used to circumvent the constitution , and ask for the united nation’s to back up that treaty with force 

as far as the world is concerned we are a minority on the global stage- and hated at that !IN A PERFECT WORLD, YOU ARE CORRECT !but if the gov want’s to dis arm the citizenry of the U S A don’t you think they would need help??where do you think the power’s that be would/could get that help?THE UNITED NATION’S !UNDER ANY TREATY THEY COULD GET TO DO SO !it’s not a matter of if they could, but WHEN they could.I would much rather be ARMED and wrong , then dis ar
RAWalker - 5/16/2010 3:00 PM

Read the articles carefully this does nothing to end run the 2nd ammendment.

This is about regulating "International Arms Trade"

Congress still must ratify all treaties.

Any signed and ratified treaty still must pass the legal muster. If it conflicts with our constitution and bill of rights it would be deemed Unconstitutional and never go into effect.

Nice of you to sound the alarm bells but please educate yourself on how the system works before trying to stir up politcal resentment against the legally elected administration simply because you don’t like them.