...It might just be me, but I’m not convinced the radioactive plume from
the Fukushima meal down will actually be HARMLESS! It’s not like this
happens often enough for the science community to have any understanding
of the characteristics of radioactive plumes and their effects!
...I’ve got a bad feeling about this one!
SYDNEY, Australia The radioactive ocean plume from the 2011 Fukushima
nuclear plant disaster will reach the shores of the US within three years
from the date of the incident but is likely to be harmless according to
new paper in the journal Deep-Sea Research 1.
While atmospheric radiation was detected on the US west coast within days
of the incident, the radioactive particles in the ocean plume take considerably
longer to travel the same distance.
In the paper, researchers from the Centre of Excellence for Climate System
Science and others used a range of ocean simulations to track the path of
the radiation from the Fukushima incident.
The models identified where it would likely travel through the world’s
oceans for the next 10 years.
"Observers on the west coast of the United States will be able to see a
measurable increase in radioactive material three years after the event,"
said one of the paper’s authors, Dr Erik van Sebille.
"However, people on those coastlines should not be concerned as the
concentration of radioactive material quickly drops below World Health
Organization safety levels as soon as it leaves Japanese waters."
Two energetic currents off the Japanese coast - the Kuroshio Current
and the Kurushio Extension – are primarily responsible for accelerating
the dilution of the radioactive material, taking it well below WHO safety
levels within four months.
Eddies and giant whirlpools – some tens of kilometers wide – and other
currents in the open ocean continue this dilution process and direct the
radioactive particles to different areas along the US west coast.
"Although some uncertainties remain around the total amount released and
the likely concentrations that would be observed, we have shown unambiguously
that the contact with the north-west American coasts will not be identical
everywhere," said Dr Vincent Rossi.
"Shelf waters north of 45°N will experience higher concentrations during a
shorter period, when compared to the Californian coast. This late but prolonged
exposure is due to the three-dimensional pathways of the plume. The plume will
be forced down deeper into the ocean toward the subtropics before rising up
again along the southern Californian shelf."
Interestingly, the great majority of the radioactive material will stay in
the North Pacific, with very little crossing south of the Equator in the first
decade. Eventually over a number of decades, a measurable but otherwise harmless
signature of the radiation will spread into other ocean basins, particularly the
Indian and South Pacific oceans.
"Australia and other countries in the Southern Hemisphere will see little if any
radioactive material in their coastal waters and certainly not at levels to cause
concern," Dr van Sebille said.
"For those interested in tracking the path of the radiation, we have developed a
website to help them.
"Using this website, members of the public can click on an area in the ocean and
track the movement of the radiation or any other form of pollution on the ocean
surface over the next 10 years."
http://www.underwatertimes.com/news.php?article_id=34820659107 |